New York mom sues baby food brand over toxic heavy metals

According to a recent Congressional report, a Staten Island mom is suing five baby-food brands after toxic levels of heavy metals were found in some of their products.

Michelle Walls says she bought baby food between July 2020 to February 2021 from Beak-Nut Nutrition Company, The Han Celestial Group Inc., Happy Family Organics, Gerber and Plum PBC – feeding her 1-year-old son “tainted” food Six months were filed Wednesday, according to the Brooklyn federal lawsuit.

Mummy then saw media coverage on 6 February About congress report, Which showed that many baby-food brands had “significant levels” of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury.

Even low levels of these metals can cause “irreversible damage to brain development”, the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy said.

Shocked by what he read, he immediately stopped feeding [her son] He has still returned tainted baby food products and the remaining products, ”court documents say of the walls.

The mother is now planning a doctor to check her son’s blood levels for heavy metals and is “arranging” for her son to receive special education services with no developmental delay. , Which may result from its uptake, the level of toxic heavy metals in tainted baby food products, ”court papers say.

In the lawsuit, Walls said Gerber was one of the brands of baby food that he fed his son.
In the lawsuit, Walls said Gerber was one of the brands of baby food that he fed his son.
Getty Images

“Walls is a devoted and loving mother who pays a premium to keep her son healthy, and consumes food that keeps her healthy and growing and developing,” the documents state.

She says that these five brands depend on “representations and reputation” and consider their baby food and especially their organic baby food as the “gold standard”.

Wills filed his case as a possible class action because many others may also have fed their babies tainted food, the suit states.

There are already other US lawsuits based on congressional reports.

The walls are suing for unspecified damages and demanding additional testing for toxic heavy metals in the products.

“Over the years, these baby-food companies have known that their products contain levels of toxic heavy metals,” said lawyer Christopher Leung of the law firm Polak Cohen LLP. “This is unacceptable, and we intend to hold these companies accountable.”

A representative for the Campbell Soup Company, which owns the plums, told the Post in an e-mailed statement on Friday, “Campbell is confident in the safety and quality of our products.

“The company does not comment on pending litigation, but we intend to vigorously defend the case.”

Four other companies did not immediately return requests for comment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.