How owners, players can reach agreement to end MLB lockout

Gil Hodges to Hall of Fame is 'unbelievable moment' for family

[ad_1]

Probably, straightening out Major League Baseball ranks as harder than armchair labor lawyers like yours truly portray it.

Definitely, it should be easier than the actual negotiating parties make it seem.

MLB and its Players Association find themselves so dysfunctional — virtually nothing has happened in the month-plus since Rob Manfred shut down the sport with a Dec. 2 lockout — that it doesn’t feel alarmist to already wonder whether the season will start on time, March 31. The notion of spring training beginning in mid-February appears as far-flung a fantasy as Michigan’s football team winning a national championship anytime soon.

It doesn’t help that the principals for the two sides truly loathe each other, nor that Manfred faces the standard commissioner’s challenge of corralling his owners (big-market, mid-market and small-market) into a unified front, nor that the union got routed by the equivalent of a 92-4 basketball score in the last collective bargaining agreement in 2016.

After surveying folks from both sides of the aisle, here’s this armchair labor lawyer’s attempt to get the sport back on track.

1. Payroll floors

This shall be my capstone, an underrated and underappreciated device that can address the players’ concerns about competitive balance as well as fair compensation for players in their 30s. Earlier in this round of bargaining, the clubs proposed payroll floors of $100 million in return for a payroll tax beginning at the $180 million level (exempt from bells and whistles such as repeat-offender penalties and dropped draft picks that come with higher thresholds). The players, philosophically opposed to a floor because they don’t want a ceiling, turned it down. Except they currently face a soft ceiling, one teams treat as pretty darn hard, in the luxury-tax thresholds. It’s time to give up that ghost.

Let’s try this: The Orioles operated the lowest payroll in 2021, a gaunt $58 million (thanks, Spotrac). How about establishing the 2022 payroll floor as $60 million then raising it by $10 million each season so that it stands at $100 million by 2026 (the standard CBA runs five years)? Eight teams spent less than $100 million last year. A failure to reach this base by Opening Day would result in forfeited draft picks.

MLB
Rob Manfred and Tony Clark
AP (2)

2. The luxury tax

In recognition of the floors, continue the modest threshold uptick of the past CBA (from $189 million in 2016 to $210 million in 2021), which would lift it to $231 million by 2026. Keep the aforementioned bells and whistles. That would still inflict some pain on Steve Cohen and his fellow big-market owners who want to go well above and beyond these thresholds.

3. Revenue sharing

As first reported by ESPN’s Jeff Passan, MLB told the PA in its final meeting, hours before Manfred instituted the lockout, that it would talk about any core economic issues besides the free-agency clock, the arbitration pool or revenue sharing. Which is like paying big bucks at a charity auction to have lunch with Ringo Starr, only to arrive at the restaurant and have Ringo say, “Absolutely no questions about The Beatles.” It’s not unreasonable to ask the revenue-sharing payees to account for the dollars they receive and face consequences for mishandling them.

4. Minimum player salary

It was $570,500 last season. Increase that to $1.2 million in 2022 and get it to $1.5 million by 2026. That will ease the players’ pain of the arbitration pool not changing and help those whose careers don’t last very long.

[ad_2]