White House press secretary Jane Saki stressed on Monday that she was pressurized on an apparent flip-flop last week to allow refugees amid criticism of refugees in the country, with White House press secretary Jane Saki asserting on Monday Stating that the initial executive order for the number should be dropped.
“We never said we’re not lifting the refugee cap in the morning. All we really said and the information we put out was that once we reach 15,000, we’ll increase it,” she told a reporter. Said in hot posture with.
“It was not accounted for, and how some people were digesting the information, and we wanted to be clear and convey the message that we are a country that is welcoming refugees.”
His remarks issued a statement on Friday afternoon saying the administration announced a higher number, despite President Biden signing an executive order two hours earlier in May to maintain the Trump administration’s 15,000 cap. Will go.
The initial order was met with strong backlash from Democratic progressives, who blasted Biden for failing to pursue his proposal put before Congress, which would increase the number of refugee admissions to 62,500 by the end of September, the fiscal year. The number increased to 125,000. The year 2022.
Rep. Pramila Jaipal (D-Wash.), Co-chair of the Congress Progressive Caucus, accused Biden of breaking his “promise to restore our humanity”.
And Lefty Firebrand Rape. Took to social media Accusing the Biden administration of upholding “xenophobic and racist policies”.
“Totally and totally unacceptable. Biden promised to welcome the immigrants, and the people voted him on the basis of that promise. The historically low + plummeted refugee cap, exposing the xenophobic and racist policies of the Trump administration, is incorrect. Keep your promise, ”she tweeted. “While this administration inherited a broken immigration system that was gutted and ransacked by the previous president, it is up to us all to fix it – quickly. An important step to do this is to attack the refugee resettlement program. Is reversing, ”she said in a statement.
Nevertheless, Saki insisted that there had been no policy change since the morning, arguing that there was language in the sequence that said if the number had reached 15,000 before the end of the financial year, there would have been an increase Maybe, what he said was ignored.
Sasaki, however, acknowledged that this increase would reach 62,500, stating that the number of journalists was “always aspirational” and meant to be “down payment” to reach the target of 125,500 refugees next year. He then blamed the Trump administration’s policies for delaying increasing the number, saying he made substantial changes by removing restrictions on refugees from Africa and the Middle East.
“We knew it was an aspirational big goal when we said, it was going to be 10 times what the Trump administration set as its goal, and we remain, we’re looking forward and we’re looking at that 125,000 Look forward to the next financial year, hoping to reach the numbers, “she continued.
“But as we came in and assessed and gave time to assess and the teams had time to assess where the challenges lay, we learned more about how the system was hollowed out. We did the challenges and the processing. Learned more about, we learned more about, of course, how these ideas will have an impact on the influx of unaccustomed children. “
Leave a Reply