Daniel Jones’ future adds to Giants’ litany of questions

Mets can't afford to hire wrong team president

[ad_1]

Gen. Curtis LeMay: “You’re in a pretty bad fix, Mr. President.” 

President Kennedy: “What did you say?” 

Gen. LeMay: “You’re in a pretty bad fix.” 

President Kennedy: “Well, maybe you haven’t noticed, but you’re in it with me.” 

— “Thirteen Days” 

Yep. The Giants are in a pretty bad fix. 

They already were, sure. The season is in shambles at 4-10. The GM is a fired man walking. The ownership is under fire in a way it hasn’t been since the bad old days of 1978. The coach’s career record is 10-20, which is a .333 winning percentage in any league, but still seems to have the stubborn support of the men who sign his checks. 

The fans are, to put it nicely, apoplectic. 

And now this. It might have seemed inevitable that we had already seen the last of Daniel Jones quarterbacking the Giants this season, given the injury to his neck. It would’ve been malpractice — both medically and organizationally — for him to risk further damage to an ultra-sensitive part of the body in the name of playing out a string of meaningless games. 

But they wouldn’t have been meaningless to a healthy Jones. 

And they wouldn’t have been meaningless to the Giants. 

Daniel Jones was shut down for the remainder of the Giants' season due to his injured neck.
Daniel Jones was shut down for the remainder of the Giants’ season due to his injured neck.
Charles Wenzelberg/New York Post

Because now in addition to every other lament that burdens the team — and they are piled high and wide, like a stack of cordwood from hell — they have to fly blind while making what will be one of the defining decisions of their future: 

[ad_2]